Saturday, July 23, 2005

Bride and Prejudice

Technorati Tag(s): ,



Gurinder Chadha's Bride and Prejudice is, I'm sorry to say, full of shit.

The biggest highlight of the film is Aishwarya Rai, who can't act to save her life, and does look way too dull and sleepy in some scenes, but still manages to keep you glued to the screen when she is on it.

Other than that, everything about it is wrong.

Let's begin with the beginning: American Dude goes to India, says it feels like New York, then they park in front of three cows and American Dude asks, "Where the hell have you brought me?"

As if you didn't already know India is a pile of stinking gobar gas.

After that you get to see a rich family with many daughters. It might as well have been an American family. It sure doesn't give much of a shit about spending money on gala weddings. This family participates in garba just as well as Punjabi bhangra. That's not how the families are in India; not even rich ones. The Mother--call her Big Mac--is your typical fat Indian mother who only wants to send her girls away. The whole arranged marriage deal is a sham.

You have four daughters: one dances and plays the sitar and sings--call her Singer; the second finds love during the Singer's marriage (or at least it seems she's getting married; don't ask me if she is)--call her Smitten--which kickstarts the story like so many overdone Bollywood tales; the third is a Hip Cool Rad totally now girl who stays up all night texting boys and wears revealing clothes--call her Hip Cool; and the fourth (our Ash) reads, takes pride in her country, wants to stay home to look after her father, and generally be the kind of girl a supposedly all-Indian guy would die to marry.

Yeah.

Can you say cliche? Perhaps you can't because you haven't been spoon-fed these same details in over ten thousand movies over and over again.

The father is a jolly fellow who loves Ash and is her best buddy and so forth.

These people have no jobs.

American Dude and companion (Balraj--the guy smitten by the sister) come to the marriage for a hitherto unspecified (and unimportant, as it is revealed later: the Dude's here to build a hotel in a long chain of global hotels) reason. American Dude sees Ash, and in grand Bolly tradition notices how beautiful she looks.

And then they differ in opinion: Ash gives patriotic speeches that her India is full of golden ducks.

She says the American Dude does not even know what the real India looks like. She says it's not just five-star hotels on beaches and stuff.

Well then fucking show me the real India. Duh! That's my biggest gripe with this film.

If you've read my previous entries, you'll know: people take a shit on roads; and then sleep in the same spot. And this happens in the biggest metropolitan city of the nation.

If you want to see real India, you'd do well to watch films like Split Wide Open, or better: Born into Brothels. Beware, though; Born into Brothels might break your heart. I know how this place is, and the film still broke mine a little.

So Ash and American Dude go to a beach in Goa1 which is nothing like a beach in Goa and Ash plays a guitar to signify how "modernized" India is. We can play the guitar! Look at us! We read books! We're not b-ass-ackwards!

Those patriotic speeches piss me off. Each time Ash opens her mouth to speak about how American Dude and all Americans are crap, delusioned, and lousy pigs who only got lucky and how Indians are pure, pure, pure pearls washed in milk and honey, I feel like asking her to shut up and just look straight at us instead. That'd be value for money, at least.

So Ash and American Dude are pissed off at each other. Like any classic romance. Inspired by Pride and Prejudice, y'know.

There's another American (or Londoner) Ash meets in Goa, and they seem to click right off. This guy--call him Bloke--says all the right things: he says the rich don't really get to see the real India2, and howdy do.

Ash being smitten and all invites Bloke to her place for garba and stuff.

Bloke says he sure will. It's Ash, for cryin' out loud! How could any guy refuse?

So Ash and her sister (who did wear swimsuits, sure, we're so modern!) come back home, and Big Mac has called some Indian export from America to select a bride.

It seems Big Mac and family is one big pool for foreign wannabe grooms.

This guy--call him Smoochie3--is all Americanized, likes Hip-Hop, and stuff. He tries to woo our lady Ash, but she's put off by his weird eating habits.

And he also doesn't look like Tom Cruise's nephew or anything.

He says he's very rich, but she's not interested. Her friend is, and we later find out her friend marries Smoochie. Plot, baby!

Bloke comes to Ash's place, and they sing-n-dance and piss American Dude off even more.

Bloke leaves promising he'll email (how modern! We know how to use MSN Explorer!), and before that Balraj leaves promising sister he'll email too.

Both never do.

But Bloke emails the Hip Cool sister. He wants a fast lay, or something.

Ash's friend and Smoochie invite Ash and three others to their marriage, and everyone except Dad and the Singer sister go to America. But they make a stop in London along the way to see Balraj, who isn't home.

Meanwhile we're shown a couple of scenes where Hip Cool sis meets with Bloke in a ferry or some such place.

Meanwhile American Dude happens to be traveling on the same plane as the foursome to America.

And I'm tired of the bullshit story.

Here's the one liner for the rest: They go to America, Bloke's bad intentions are revealed, Ash sees American Dude in a new light, and they get married.

Did all that happen in a little over two hours? You bet.

Did I mention the Singer Sister does a snake dance reminiscent of Sridevi in Nagina?

Did I mention how utterly disappointed I was with this film?

It was a crossover success, it seems. That's natural--for an audience who knows nothing of Bollywoo'd song-n-dance staple, Bride and Prejudice would feel fresh and new. But for someone who's grown on this stuff, grown over it, off it, and ultimately jumped off the wagon, it's a retarded waste of time.

Oh, that girl from Gilmore Girl makes a cameo. So does some other grandlady. There's loads of song-n-dance; the kind that makes me retch.

They even managed to make Ash look pale and plain a few times. Completely unforgivable.

__________________
1Big Mac comments, "Balraj will get to see her in a bikini!" See? We ain't b-ass-ackwards! We don't mind our daughters wearing bikinis!
2That phrase, "real India" is getting on my nerves.
3For no particular reason.4
4And on a completely unrelated note: if you search for repeat telecast on yahoo, you get this blog as the first result.

6 Comments:

Blogger Julie said...

This film (as I understood it) is supposed to be Pride and Prejudice meets Bollywood romance.

I have some questions: Does this mean Bride doesn't follow Bollywood romance conventions? Your main complaint is that it's too unrealistic--are Bollywood romances typically more realistic? Your comments make me interested in seeing more Bollywood films if they truly are more realistic about "what is India." If Bollywood films usually give a more realistic portrayal of India, could you recommend one I could see (and find via Netflix, if possible).

I guess what I'm wondering is this: do you think Bride's crap because it mimics Bollywood conventions and you despise Bollywood conventions, or do you think it's crap because it does a crap job of mimicking Bollywood conventions?

The plot would make a lot more sense (i.e., seem more logical and motivated) if you had seen a literal version of or read Pride and Prejudice. However, I'm of the opinion that a viewer should never have to see/read "the original" of anything for the remake to be accessible--so your complaints about the plot are well-taken. It should be understandable whether you know the original material or not. (It's hard for me to criticize the film on plot level because I'm so well-versed on the source material; to the degree that I thought some of the transformations from source material to modern day plot/character were bordering-on-brilliant.)

Here's the real question: if you loved Bollywood romance, would this film hold up? Or would it still suck?

Because if it's a decent version of Bollywood romance, you can't really fault it for being what it is. You wouldn't pick up a romance book and fault it for not having the depth that HoL has!

7/31/2005 1:56 AM  
Blogger sutrix said...

Wow, that's a lot of questions.

Bride follows Bollywood romance conventions. Bollywood romances are usually full of gas. In a sense, very few Bollywood movies actually portray what India is. Almost all Bollywood romances are dream-theme classic Hollywood movie rip-offs. The thing is, Gurinder Chadha's previous film was a surprisingly amiable blend of Indian-English culture, even though the story was so typically boring. With Bride, all she did is introduce an American Dude in a corn-of-the-mill romance the likes of which we've been spoonfed since time immemorial. It gets boring fast.

As I mentioned, you could see Born into Brothels, a realistic take on Calcutta's prostitution scene (and nary a light in sight; watch with as much detachment as you can because involving emotion may lead to horrendous consequences), Split Wide Open, and a few Hindi films with subtitles like Satya, Prahaar. You might not be able to find them easily, but if you can, I recommend each and every one of them.

You asked: do you think Bride's crap because it mimics Bollywood conventions and you despise Bollywood conventions, or do you think it's crap because it does a crap job of mimicking Bollywood conventions?

Bride is crap because it doesn't mimic Bollywood conventions, it defines Bollywood conventions. If you've seen Bride, you've seen typically every single Bollywood romance from the past 50 years. As I said, watching the same old thing gets highly boring after a while.

I'm of the same opinion: an adaptation does not have to rely on the original. That's why remakes of Psycho and the like suck so bad, among a lot of other things. The main thing, I think, is that even though I haven't a clue what ol' Shakey's Pride was about, I'll go out on a limb that a simple love story was just one of its facets. That's the basic problem with Chadha's (and most of Bollywood's) love story: they're only love stories. Simple, brainless ones that everyone imagines by the hordes in their teens.

If I loved Bollywood romance would this one hold up? As a Bollywood romance, perhaps. No, actually not. Here's why: the songs aren't any great shakes; the locales are too old and overused; so's the dialog; none of the supposedly funny bits are actually funny; and most importantly, Ash and the American Dude have zero chemistry. Heck, Rani Mukerjee and Shah Rukh Khan have more vibes going on in Veer Zaara, and they're not even lovers in that film!

You're right: I wouldn't expect a HoL in a Sydney Sheldon book; but after reading HoL, you can't help wanting every book to have that depth, can you?

7/31/2005 2:01 PM  
Blogger Julie said...

RE: "You're right: I wouldn't expect a HoL in a Sydney Sheldon book; but after reading HoL, you can't help wanting every book to have that depth, can you?"

So true.

You said, "I haven't a clue what ol' Shakey's Pride was about"--who is "ol' Shakey"? I've never heard this before. This isn't a reference to Jane Austen, is it?

8/01/2005 12:01 AM  
Blogger sutrix said...

Ha, it's one of those inside jokes I share with a few friends. I'm sorry for assuming the rest of the world was privy to it.

We call Shakespeare ol' Aussie, and Austen ol' Shakey. No particular reason, except that once someone accidentally used one for another and it kind of stuck.

8/01/2005 11:43 AM  
Blogger Julie said...

I LOVE it!

Tee hee hee....too bad it's not my in-joke, because I'd love to use it.

8/02/2005 12:44 AM  
Blogger sutrix said...

Use it, then. That'll be ten cents per use. Heh.

8/02/2005 12:24 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home